> > Well, autoanalyze only runs in this case if autovacuum is disabled via the
> > table's autovacuum_enabled reloption and _not_ disabled via the autovacuum
> > or track_counts GUCs. I think this is pretty clearly unintentional, as I
> > can find no mention in the code, archives, or docs. And unless I'm missing
> > something, it's completely unnecessary. So IMHO we should just remove it.
>
> +1. I think it might be better to mention this in the documentation to
> make the behavior explicit. What do you think about stating that an
> anti-wraparound autovacuum does not perform an ANALYZE, like in the
> attached patch?
+1 to the additional documentation.
a small nit: We can just say "skipped" and not "still skipped".
--
Sami
