Re: request for comment re "contributor-covenant.org" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Zenaan Harkness
Subject Re: request for comment re "contributor-covenant.org"
Date
Msg-id CAOsGNST9zLirvLQ-8oQHZvSd8ah6Dw0vfCHv5t51NS4RKThLyg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: request for comment re "contributor-covenant.org"  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi Josh,

I simply wrote in first person with the intention to catalyse thought
about what could and or should and or should not be in such a
"covenant". In no way was the email any statement of authority and I
had hoped to make that clear, evidently not.

Evidently it was not clear enough despite my disclaimer at the top.

My sincere apologies for the confusion - such confusion was seriously
not wanted by me and I apologise unreservedly.

On the topic, I feel it will take a few years yet for "the libre
software community" to come to anything approaching a consensus
regarding "community covenant"; just my opinion of course.

Regards,
Zenaan


On 1/26/16, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Mr. Harkness,
>
> First, the discussion you reference is now materially over.
>
> Second, you are not an administrator of this, or any other PostgreSQL
> mailing list of which I am aware.  As such, you are in no position to
> dictate what is, or is not, acceptable on this list and will get someone
> "banned"; only our Infra Team can do that.  Please do not presume to do
> so for them.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Red Hat OSAS
> (opinions are my own)


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Igal @ Lucee.org"
Date:
Subject: Re: Tutorial on How to Compile PostgreSQL 9.5 for Windows 64bit
Next
From: pafiti
Date:
Subject: Issue with jdbc_fdw on Postgres 9.5