Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id CAOBaU_bT7yU7sLHMhf+PSaV9W+q9Lp6OUfCXFRCdQ2jPf0bJmw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 14 Sept 2024, 12:39 Tom Lane, <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> While adapting in pg_stat_kcache the fix for buggy nesting level calculation, I
> noticed that one comment referencing the old approach was missed.  Trivial
> patch attached.

Hmm ... I agree that para is out of date, but is there anything to
salvage rather than just delete it?

I thought about it but I think that now that knowledge is in the else branch, with the mention that we still have to bump the nesting level even if it's not locally handled. 
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Add memory/disk usage for WindowAgg nodes in EXPLAIN