Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Is the pg_isready database name relevant? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Ron Johnson
Subject Is the pg_isready database name relevant?
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaAob4BFkhc2-w_vJrm-8KgELNnmqJJhc4oNDuY-O9+Azg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?
List pgsql-admin
Tree view
The "-d, --dbname=DBNAME" option is mentioned in --help output, but pg_isready ignores nonexistent databases.

$ psql -V
psql (PostgreSQL) 17.6
$ pg_isready -d blarge -h BBOSLBXPGS402
BBOSLBXPGS402:5432 - accepting connections

Is this an application bug, a minor doc bug or am I missing something?

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: rebuild big tables with pgrepack
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?