Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZyBkjLxYt5RpPVnbO_EMAyfYwp-XhSKeebRhyNFM9SVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is the pg_isready database name relevant?  (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?
List pgsql-admin
Tree view
On Monday, November 24, 2025, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:
The "-d, --dbname=DBNAME" option is mentioned in --help output, but pg_isready ignores nonexistent databases.

Is this an application bug, a minor doc bug or am I missing something?

It’s documented in the Notes section.

David J.
 

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?