Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikhil Sontakke
Subject Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints
Date
Msg-id CANgU5ZdMGbN4y2uzV0iZk-x+brAyVs_Eggp6kyf0gtcCUXbrLg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

 
> I will really try to see if we have other issues. Really cannot have Robert
> reporting all the bugs and getting annoyed, but there are lotsa variations
> possible with inheritance..

BTW thank you for doing the work on this.  Probably the reason no one
bothers too much with inheritance is that even something that's
seemingly simple such as what you tried to do here has all these little
details that's hard to get right.


Thanks Alvaro. Yeah, inheritance is "semantics" quicksand :) 

Appreciate all the help from you, Robert and Alex Hunsaker on this.

Regards,
Nikhils

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikhil Sontakke
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Restore process during recovery