So, let's just flat-out ask.
Dear Important People: would the PostgreSQL project consider
supporting other query languages? Or creating a plug-in mechanism for
them, so that alternative interface languages could be added without
changing the base code?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Guyren Howe <guyren@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone familiar with the issue would have to say that the tech world would be a significantly better place if IBM had
developeda real relational database with an elegant query language rather than the awful camel of a thing that is SQL.
>
> If I had a few $million to spend in a philanthropical manner, I would hire some of the best PG devs to develop a
properrelational database server. Probably a query language that expressed the relational algebra in a scheme-like
syntax,and the storage model would be properly relational (eg no duplicate rows).
>
> It's an enormous tragedy that all the development effort that has gone into NoSQL database has pretty much all gotten
itwrong: by all means throw out SQL, but not the relational model with it. They're all just rehashing the debate over
hierarchicalstorage from the 70s. Comp Sci courses should feature a history class.
>
> It's a bit odd to me that someone isn't working on such a thing.
>
> Just curious what folks here have to say…
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Ray Brinzer
