Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZYYS9U_kHkAXF_B7UxezkcgFDFdOTgTV9F2r-FL016AGw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 2:24 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For the next version patch, I'll work on this idea and try to clean up
> locking stuff both in tidstore and radix tree. Or if you're already
> working on some of them, please let me know. I'll review it.

Okay go ahead, sounds good. I plan to look at the tests since they
haven't been looked at in a while.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Implement missing join selectivity estimation for range types
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly