Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZYC4GbDGzNfBCPJU0x5wfWBtwRzgL4ksC4tfXTwhEjV1g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions  (Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:04 AM Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> All diff files have already been added to v21-0002-Introduce-indexes-for-RestrictInfo patch.

Unfortunately, the patch tester is too smart for its own good, and
will try to apply .diff files as well. Since
bug_related_to_atomic_function.diff is first in the alphabet, it comes
first, which is the reason for the current CI failure.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication