Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jLKD5u-R4aR78_-DKV2Wd1Q8wFNE0nh19wxVkyAX8uXLw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 23 November 2017 at 11:11, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is older than the bug report of this thread. All those
> indications point out that the patch has *not* been committed. So it
> seems to me that you perhaps committed it to your local repository,
> but forgot to push it to the remote. I am switching back the patch
> status to what looks correct to me "Ready for committer". Thanks.

Yes, that looks like it's my mistake. Thanks for rechecking.

Will commit and backpatch when I get home.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oliver Ford
Date:
Subject: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions
Next
From: Erikjan Rijkers
Date:
Subject: Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the WindowFunctions