On 7 March 2017 at 19:22, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> That may need tweaking. Likely it could be smaller if we had some sort
>>> of bloom filter to mark if the transaction had obtained any AEL locks,
>>> that way it could skip. Initially I really didn't want to make the
>>> patch too complex. I had thought that a fairly large hash table would
>>> fix the problem well enough, as quite possibly most buckets would be
>>> empty and non empty buckets have short lists.
>>
>> ISTM that we should mark each COMMIT if it has an AEL, so we can avoid
>> any overhead in the common case.
>>
>> So an additional sub-record for the commit/abort wal record, via
>> include/access/xact.h
>
> That would be ideal if we could do that, but doing that for so many
> possible transaction IDs seems impractical.
Don't understand this. I'm talking about setting a flag on
commit/abort WAL records, like the attached.
We just need to track info so we can set the flag at EOXact and we're done.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
