Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJ9e4fv3NUcVgbgME6VhmSZLf42a8MD9yNCJNnNcXZe6w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 00:46, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Here's a sample
concurrent index build on a 100M tuple table.

Cool
 
There are no concurrent
transactions, so phases that wait for lockers don't appear.

Would prefer to see them, so we know they are zero. 

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shawn Debnath
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: 2019-02-14 Press Release Draft