Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Date
Msg-id 5ba2b281-9c84-772a-cf37-17780d782936@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019/02/13 11:59, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 00:46, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Here's a sample
>> concurrent index build on a 100M tuple table.
> 
> 
> Cool

+1

Looking at the "([phase] x of x)" in the sample output, I thought
pg_stat_progress_vacuum's output should've had it too (not a concern of
Alvaro's patch though.)

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast path for empty relids in check_outerjoin_delay()
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]