Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJ-Wt_cZ782iHBL-_ouPwmYDrSp2F52yYy+=M_mvvURtA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1 February 2018 at 12:45, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> I think it would be very helpful if we could discuss everything with
> direct relevance to v14, so this becomes a patch review, not just a
> debate.
> i.e. which isolation test would we like to change from ERROR to
> success? or which new test would you like to add?
>
> Thanks

In my understanding, we are discussing changing the potential outcome
from concurrent operations on the small subset of test results noted
in the attached patch-on-patch. (This will break the patch tester)

If you can confirm these are the ones we are discussing and say what
you think the output should be, that will help us be very specific .

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: no partition pruning when partitioning using array type
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound