Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Date
Msg-id CANP8+j+8c5wN8k-RLDgh1vWr-FT_HubO6rU5w6fdJV2WjyQ=cA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] SQL procedures  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 31 October 2017 at 18:23, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> I've been working on SQL procedures.  (Some might call them "stored
> procedures", but I'm not aware of any procedures that are not stored, so
> that's not a term that I'm using here.)

I guess that the DO command might have a variant to allow you to
execute a procedure that isn't stored?

Not suggesting you implement that, just thinking about why/when the
"stored" word would be appropriate.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix dumping pre-10 DBs by pg_dump10 if table "name" exists
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Anyone have experience benchmarking very higheffective_io_concurrency on NVME's?