Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Subject Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date
Msg-id CAN55FZ1vrMRRFRX+GUg=VgRuLxXKAta4cmU9TdOTG9azVrhDfg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 23:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> > I suspect what you're really after here is the functionality of the
> > check-tabs and check-nbsp targets.  So the new Perl script really just
> > has to cover those two and doesn't have to bother with xmllint.  And
> > then you just call that script as part of the postgres-full.xml target.
>
> Yeah, that's what I was imagining: replace the xmllint call in
> postgres-full.xml with this new script that will also run the
> tab/nbsp checks.

Does not this mean we can not run the syntax check by itself in the
make builds? If I understand correctly, we need to create
postgres-full.xml each time we want to run the syntax check, right?

I was under the impression that the sgml_syntax_check.pl test would be
a lightweight way to do a syntax check, so that we could easily use it
by itself or in the CI.

-- 
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Date:
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Add memory_limit_hits to pg_stat_replication_slots