Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Subject Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date
Msg-id CAN55FZ0806U7DboVN-AJQ0Tm=ssZKL8hKAbBp7OvWYT6e4GJ1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 11:54, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> On 06.10.25 10:29, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> >
> > I can work on this but I want to clarify it first. Which one do you prefer:
> >
> > 1- We won't have any command to do syntax checks (including tab and
> > nbsp), these checks will automatically run when we generate docs.
> >
> > 2- We will have a 'check' target but it will only do tab and nbsp
> > checks; xmllint will run only when generating the docs.
>
> I don't know, people have a lot of individual workflows, and they are
> not reading this thread.  I still don't know what we are actually trying
> to fix here, I just noticed that what was committed is flawed.

The problem was meson build doesn't have tab and nbsp checks [1]. We
were trying to enable these checks on meson build by moving these
checks to the perl script so that we can run this script on both build
systems.

> I would prefer that b2922562726 be reverted, and then someone start a
> new thread with a descriptive change proposal.

Sounds good to me. I can create a new thread if it gets reverted.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7020df24-1d5f-41e5-8948-2e8d5da57935%40dunslane.net

-- 
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Filip Janus
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Better Performance for PostgreSQL with large INSERTs
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences