Re: Refactor handling of "-only" options in pg_dump, pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zsolt Parragi
Subject Re: Refactor handling of "-only" options in pg_dump, pg_restore
Date
Msg-id CAN4CZFPbxT3+L=d5+cczUbVQcCRSmNxZt0gzJEfL3hHmVO3rXg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Refactor handling of "-only" options in pg_dump, pg_restore  (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Refactor handling of "-only" options in pg_dump, pg_restore
List pgsql-hackers
Hello

Simple patch and looks good, just one very minor about this comment:

 /* reject conflicting "-only" options */

I would either remove the comment or the "-only" part, as that's no longer true.
(I see that it was there earlier in the later if, and it was similarly
incorrect. So this is not new with the patch, but still seems wrong)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash-based MCV matching for large IN-lists
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_plan_advice