Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zsolt Parragi
Subject Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)
Date
Msg-id CAN4CZFNYau8SmBK-fYLHooTnYwCrB7H6E7eL9EKR5+1aZA0e1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)  (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> did you have a
> particular compiler in mind?

It worked on x86 gcc/clang where I tested it, but I was worried that
postgres supports many different platforms and could cause issues
somewhere.
But it's not an issue: after looking at it for a while I completely
forgot/ignored that the masking expression has several explicit casts,
so it is well defined in C11 and shouldn't cause warnings anywhere.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE: warn when actions do not recurse to partitions
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)