Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YFnDYxM1vwVBEonZYt+N3pf_g4s2Q3OQ7PGcmPO5amWOg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 29 April 2016 at 10:12, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
 

My larger question was, was 9.6 an ideal time to do this, and if so, why
did this issue not get done.  If 9.6 wasn't in some way ideal, we can do
it in 9.7.


Doing it at the very beginning of the release cycle seems like a good idea.

I just helped another person yesterday who deleted their pg_xlog.


--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Crash in apply_projection_to_path
Next
From: sri harsha
Date:
Subject: UNION ALL - Var attno