Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date
Msg-id 20160429021220.GA30154@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:07:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Are we going to rename pg_xlog or pg_clog for 9.6?
> 
> NO.  We don't even have a patch for this, much less one that's been
> through any review.  This suggestion is at least two months too late.

My larger question was, was 9.6 an ideal time to do this, and if so, why
did this issue not get done.  If 9.6 wasn't in some way ideal, we can do
it in 9.7.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.6 scariest patch tournament
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Crash in apply_projection_to_path