Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YEw40zn3ThurGUgnCuiKMRySTtvekzqDetuGJwh-GvfFQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?  (Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26 April 2017 at 08:30, Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com> wrote:

> Default for hot_standby parameter should be "on" from PostgreSQL 10?
>
> In PostgreSQL 10, -w option is default for [pg_ctl start].
> So in order to start standby we have to setting hot_standby to "on" or
> start standby with -W option.

Yeah. That's a good reason to change it. I think at this point warm
standby is clearly the less-used secondary option and hot_standby
should be default.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Huong Dangminh
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Separation walsender & normal backends