Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YEPWFyYujbLsV-3p8jdQs+nsjmZc6SAaqbM_Ra1na-Jrg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumeratedatabases?  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
Responses Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumeratedatabases?  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1 December 2017 at 23:04, Chapman Flack wrote: > On 11/29/2017 05:48 PM, Chapman Flack wrote: > > I'm thinking of writing a background worker that will enumerate > > the databases present, and spin off, for each one, another BGW > > that will establish a connection and do stuff. > > Can I even do this? > > "Unlike RegisterBackgroundWorker, which can only be called > from within the postmaster, RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker > must be called from a regular backend." > > Can I call RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker when not in the postmaster, > but also not in a "regular backend", but rather another BGW? > Yes. BDR does it a lot. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes