Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Isaac Morland
Subject Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Date
Msg-id CAMsGm5fBOEY48UYRDnDqb7Pve5-K2FuQ8c8RuVftwinCD_+Lug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?  (Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>)
Responses Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?  (Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 24 July 2018 at 18:17, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
Note that it's OK to *accidentally* implement patented algorithms as
long as the author of the contribution didn't know about.  There's no
trebble damages in that case, and no tainting of others, plus,
contributors and code reviewers/committers can't be expected to do
patent searches for each contribution.


Non-lawyer here, but "OK" is not a description I would apply to implementing a patented algorithm. You might be thinking of copyright. Of course it is true that people can't reasonably be expected to do patent searches, as you describe, but the patent system as applied to software is not well-known among knowledgeable people for being reasonable. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid extra Sort nodes between WindowAggs when sorting can bereused