Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: [HACKERS] distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1yuEnrM7v+beQqkDUOmndemUO6+OnrACH7n1e4tNfFLug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> This patch still applies, and I think the argument for it is still valid.
> So I'm going to make a commit-fest entry for it.  Is there additional
> evidence we should gather?

I think we had consensus to apply this at the start of the next
development cycle; I just forgot to do it for v10.  Hence, pushed
into v11.

Thanks,

Jeff

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90