Re: [HACKERS] distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list
Date
Msg-id 24184.1502912450@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> This patch still applies, and I think the argument for it is still valid.
> So I'm going to make a commit-fest entry for it.  Is there additional
> evidence we should gather?

I think we had consensus to apply this at the start of the next
development cycle; I just forgot to do it for v10.  Hence, pushed
into v11.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()