Re: [GENERAL] bloat indexes - opinion - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: [GENERAL] bloat indexes - opinion
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1yHT_ZU98QU4ovnwik8kk4HEJ4mM-R1yzHy_KqE7MBCog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] bloat indexes - opinion  (Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] bloat indexes - opinion  (Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys,

I've got a lot of bloat indexes on my 4TB database.

Let's take this example:
Table: seg
Index: ix_filter_by_tree
Times_used: 1018082183
Table_size: 18 GB -- wrong. The table is mostly on pg_toast table. Its real size is 2TB
Index_size: 17 GB
Num_writes 16245023
Index definition: CREATE INDEX ix_filter_by_tree ON seg USING btree (full_path varchar_pattern_ops) WHERE (full_path IS NOT NULL)

What is this from?  If you think the table size reported should include toast, then change it to do that, or request the author of whatever-this-is to make that change.

What indication is there that the index is bloated?  If the meat-and-potatoes of a table is held in toast, then wouldn't you expect the size of the table and the size of the index to be about the same?
 
Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rob Brucks
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] NOTIFY command impact
Next
From: Dylan Luong
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] Postgres HA