On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
On 3/22/15 5:46 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Isn't better doesn't support "TRANSFORM ALL" clause? If somebody would > to use transformations - then he have to explicitly enable it by > "TRANSFORM FOR TYPE" ? It is safe and without possible user unexpectations.
Following our off-list conversation, here is a new patch that removes the TRANSFORM ALL/NONE clauses and requires an explicit list.
Hi Peter,
This commit is causing a compiler warning for me in non-cassert builds:
