On 3/22/15 5:46 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Isn't better doesn't support "TRANSFORM ALL" clause? If somebody would
> to use transformations - then he have to explicitly enable it by
> "TRANSFORM FOR TYPE" ? It is safe and without possible user unexpectations.
Following our off-list conversation, here is a new patch that removes
the TRANSFORM ALL/NONE clauses and requires an explicit list.
