Re: Database block lifecycle - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: Database block lifecycle
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1x4rkCV1dNQ9DX1G9+kXo_0yKtBe--ydxcix-TcvYJpWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Database block lifecycle  (pinker <pinker@onet.eu>)
Responses Re: Database block lifecycle  (Robin <robinstc@live.co.uk>)
List pgsql-general

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:07 AM, pinker <pinker@onet.eu> wrote:
>>
>> btw. 512MB if we assume up to 600 connection is a reasonable value?
>>
>
>>Reasonable value for what?
>
> For normal server load.

512MB is being questioned as a reasonable value for what?  shared_buffers?  work_mem?  maintenance_work_mem?

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jimmy Thrasibule
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL as a triple store
Next
From: Robin
Date:
Subject: Re: Database block lifecycle