Re: Forks of pgadmin3? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Frank Alberto Rodriguez Solana
Subject Re: Forks of pgadmin3?
Date
Msg-id CAMj3sNKBiTOy_e0UkGapd4vWNkBEJ9cf4cv2vfx8A4oMwpaM2g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Forks of pgadmin3?  (Christian Henz <c.henz@software-vision.eu>)
List pgsql-general
You could try OmniDB, is web app but have a version that just feels like a
desktop application. Is supported by 2ndQuadrant.

This is the official website  https://omnidb.org/en/

Greetings

El vie., 22 mar. 2019 a las 4:56, Christian Henz (<c.henz@software-vision.eu>) escribió:
I know I'm late to the party, but we're only now migrating from
Postgres 9.x, realizing that pgadmin3 does not support Postgres 11.

I have checked out pgadmin4, but I don't like it at all. My colleagues
feel the same way, and some web searching suggests that we are not
alone.

So I wonder if there are any active forks of pgadmin3?

I found some on Github with some significant changes that I assume
were done by people working for VK, the Russian social network. These
appear to be personal hacks though (monosyllabic commit messages, build
scripts added with hard coded local paths etc.).

There are also the Debian packages that have patches adding Postgres
10 support among other things. Not sure if there would be interest
there in continuing to support newer Postgres versions.

Are there other, more organized efforts to continue pgadmin3?

Are there technical reasons why such a continuation would not make
sense?

Cheers,
Christian

--
Christian Henz
Software Developer, software & vision Sarrazin GmbH & Co. KG


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: Script which shows performance of ByteA: ascii vs binary
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Forks of pgadmin3?