Do all superuser processes count toward superuser_reserved_connections? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeremy Finzel
Subject Do all superuser processes count toward superuser_reserved_connections?
Date
Msg-id CAMa1XUhS8JZpP+pAg+eK4tP8ixcZU10Tz0p3-0_ynrw2bmFfUA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Do all superuser processes count towardsuperuser_reserved_connections?  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
I don't find a clear mention in the docs of superuser processes that are exempt from counting toward superuser_reserved_connections.  So I would think that it's possible that postgres autovac workers ought to count toward that.  Am I wrong about that?  I actually have the same question about pglogical replication background workers and manager, which also run as postgres.

Do I need to increase my limit to account for these workers, or are some or all of these processes ignored by superuser_reserved_connections?

Many thanks!
Jeremy

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: TPC-DS queries
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: ERROR: XX000: cannot update SecondarySnapshot during a parallel operation