Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hunaid Sohail
Subject Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Date
Msg-id CAMWA6yZBU-AjdYijdXj7pxdatikXqqoVbvYb78R8BScHYR8Giw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+  (Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>)
Responses Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:16 PM Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de> wrote:
On 26.09.24 09:15, Hunaid Sohail wrote:
> This patch renames "Current User" to "Authenticated User" as suggested
> by me in my last email. I have also updated the documentation accordingly.

Could you perhaps in the documentation elaborate a bit more on the
difference between "Current User" and "Authenticated User"? IMHO a
couple of words on how exactly they differ would be very helpful, as
they show the same user in many cases.

There is no "Current User" in the conninfo+; as I mentioned, I have renamed it to "Authenticated User".
There are two users in the conninfo+: 'session' and 'authenticated'. Both are documented.
 
Although a bit redundant, I'd argue that "SSL Compression" is better
than just "Compression".

Noted.

Regards,
Hunaid Sohail 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
Next
From: Jim Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+