Re: alter view foo set () -- fixed in 9.2 stable, but when will it be released? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ondrej Ivanič
Subject Re: alter view foo set () -- fixed in 9.2 stable, but when will it be released?
Date
Msg-id CAM6mieL+TPQh0LFmbg_RyomLpGQD7Jzqgb80c1cha9ki2F1X_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: alter view foo set () -- fixed in 9.2 stable, but when will it be released?  (Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: alter view foo set () -- fixed in 9.2 stable, but when will it be released?  (Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi,

On 5 November 2012 08:39, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Joe Van Dyk <joe@tanga.com> wrote:
> Point of random curiosity: The commit mentioned adds the following line:
>
> if (rinfo->reloptions && strlen(rinfo->reloptions) > 0)
>
> Is there a reason this isn't done as:
>
> if (rinfo->reloptions && *rinfo->reloptions)
>
> ? It seems like overkill to ascertain the string length just to find
> out if the first character is the null terminator.

My guess is to be multibyte encoding safe: UTF-16 or similar.


--
Ondrej Ivanic
(ondrej.ivanic@gmail.com)


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chris Angelico
Date:
Subject: Re: alter view foo set () -- fixed in 9.2 stable, but when will it be released?
Next
From: Nyamul Hassan
Date:
Subject: Recover from failed files