Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZTtkUzJjm4pTmSmL-0W_RhvBPuEGPRQDaEgbHSDh==2pA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?  (Sergey Konoplev <gray.ru@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, this is a general problem with any extension - somebody might
> want it on a system on which the admin is unable or unwilling to
> install it.  But we can't put every possible extension in core.

The flip-side is that we could have made an awful lot of built-in
things extensions, but for whatever reason chose not to. I'm not
necessarily in favor of putting pgstattuple in core, but the question
should be asked: Why should we do this here? In what way is
pgstattuple like or not like the other things that are in core?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Hale Boyes
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add DISCARD SEQUENCES command.
Next
From: Sergey Konoplev
Date:
Subject: Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?