On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think a buildfarm animal that doesn't run the actual upstream
>> code is a good idea. That'll make it a lot harder to understand what's
>> going on when something breaks after a commit. It'd also require the
>> custom patches being rebased ontop of $branch before every run...
>
> hm. oh well. maybe if there was a separate page for custom builds
> (basically, an unsupported section).
I think that's a bad idea. The QNX OS seems to be mostly used in
safety-critical systems; it has a microkernel design. I think it would
be particularly bad to have iffy support for something like that.
--
Peter Geoghegan
