Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSqDaRG9c12XewsKqFLkNAak1kxie3UZ6+Wi9cC2UKT8g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Ooops.  But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build?
> Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical?

The candidates list is absolutely critical.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0