Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQNyppCWY8UetMoVF85mUfPjV_8_2Uoy=YwhPTTiSkg1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Ooops.  But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build?
>> Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical?
>
> The candidates list is absolutely critical.

However, the problematic code path is only a couple of times in the
regression test.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0