On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps we're honoring this more in the breech than in the observance, > but I'm not making up what Tom has said about this: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27310.1251410965@sss.pgh.pa.us > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/19174.1299782543@sss.pgh.pa.us > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3413.1301154369@sss.pgh.pa.us > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3261.1401915832@sss.pgh.pa.us Of course, not doing a catversion bump after beta1 doesn't necessarily have much value in and of itself. *Promising* to not do a catversion bump, and then usually keeping that promise definitely has a certain value, but clearly we are incapable of that. -- Peter Geoghegan
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных