On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Feng Tian <ftian@vitessedata.com> wrote:
> Agree everything in principal,except one thing -- no, random IO on HDD in
> 2010s (relative to CPU/Memory/SSD), is not any faster than tape in 1970s.
> :-)
Sure. The advantage of replacement selection could be a deciding
factor in unrepresentative cases, as I mentioned, but even then it's
not going to be a dramatic difference as it would have been in the
past.
By the way, please don't top-post.
--
Peter Geoghegan
