Re: remaining open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: remaining open items
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQ8sf838VSce0qqXZmyc7eyafXuyCc=3n2dzoRqb40FOw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remaining open items  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: remaining open items  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all?
>
> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile
> goal, but certainly not a release blocker.

While I agree with this assessment, I think that there is value in
doing it before release, to ease keeping the branches in sync. That
seems like the better time to backpatch to 9.5. That was the thinking
behind putting it on the open items list.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt