Re: remaining open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: remaining open items
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaUwj98U_2U5tgy=s=KQYZB4xgxH+Gh8WxP1XyutuG52g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remaining open items  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all?
>>
>> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile
>> goal, but certainly not a release blocker.
>
> While I agree with this assessment, I think that there is value in
> doing it before release, to ease keeping the branches in sync. That
> seems like the better time to backpatch to 9.5. That was the thinking
> behind putting it on the open items list.

That makes sense, but I think it's time to remove anything that
doesn't smell like an actual release blocker.  I'll go do that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: DROP DATABASE variant that kills active sessions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: remaining open items