Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HPZiQbqyxeD+y6X1HKuPgbwAX3QOT_gk2e2uxmyiEe2hg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Materialized views WIP patch
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> I prefer RESET, especially since it could eventually support RESET ALL
> MATERIALIZED VIEWS if that turns out to be useful.  How does the parser
> like that?

Isn't reset currently only used for GUCs? I think that makes for a
strange crossover.

Really, I'm sorry for bringing this up. I really don't think
"truncate" is a bad way to spell it.


-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch