Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQyhwMHeDExqKy03N7=XbGEcS0GQrdZPtNkeDPSje4PPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> I prefer RESET, especially since it could eventually support RESET ALL
> MATERIALIZED VIEWS if that turns out to be useful.  How does the parser
> like that?

Isn't reset currently only used for GUCs? I think that makes for a
strange crossover.
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Next
From: Jov
Date:
Subject: ERROR: invalid option "use_remote_estimate"