On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm
> suspicious of s_lock.h's support for National Semiconductor 32K,
> Renesas' M32R, Renesas' SuperH, UNIVEL, SINIX / Reliant UNIX,
> Nextstep, and Sun3
Were there ever multiprocessor Nextstep or Sun3 machines anyways?
Wouldn't someone on these OSes want spinlocks to immediately sleep
anyways?
I did experiment a while back with getting a vax emulator going to
build postgres on it but even then I was running NetBSD.
--
greg
