Re: 9.3: summary of corruption detection / checksums / CRCs discussion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 9.3: summary of corruption detection / checksums / CRCs discussion
Date
Msg-id 4F9753FB.2010006@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 9.3: summary of corruption detection / checksums / CRCs discussion  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/21/12 2:40 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> If we do use WAL for hint bit updates, that has an impact on Hot
> Standby, because HS can't write WAL. So, it would seem that HS could not
> set hint bits.

If we're WAL-logging hint bits, then the standby would be receiving
them, so it doesn't *need* to write them.

However, I suspect that WAL-logging hint bits would be prohibitively
expensive.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: remove dead ports?
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Temporary tables under hot standby