On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Well, I assume we are done for another five years. The includes removed
> were minimal, especially considering five years of work.
>
What I wouldn't mind seeing is a graph of all includes and what they
include. This might help figure out what layering violations there are
like the one that caused this mess. I think I've seen tools to do this
already somewhere.
--
greg
