On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 15:55, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Well, I assume we are done for another five years. The includes removed
>> were minimal, especially considering five years of work.
>>
>
> What I wouldn't mind seeing is a graph of all includes and what they
> include. This might help figure out what layering violations there are
> like the one that caused this mess. I think I've seen tools to do this
> already somewhere.
http://doxygen.postgresql.org will do some of that, but I think not
globally - but if you click into one header, I think it shows you the
map from that perspective.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
