Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patchfor hash index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shubham Barai
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patchfor hash index
Date
Msg-id CALxAEPs9-NgffFcitK0YftgozJhEF01NceELxUDZfyzOTJRU3Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patchfor hash index  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 15 January 2018 at 08:03, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
Greeting Shubham, all,

* Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Shubham Barai
> <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have attached the rebased version of patch here.
>
> The patch does not apply and there has been no reviews as well. In
> consequence, I am moving it to next CF with "waiting on author" as
> status. Please provide a rebased patch.

Shubham, would you mind providing an updated patch which applies
cleanly, so we can change this to Needs Review and hopefully get someone
looking at it?  Also, it would be good to respond to Alexander's as to
if it would work or not (and perhaps updating the patch accordingly).
Otherwise, I'm afriad this patch may end up just getting bumped to the
next CF or ending up as 'returned with feedback'.  Would be great to get
this up to a point where it could be committed.



Hi Stephen,

The new approach was suggested after completion of GSoC. So, I didn't get
enough time to implement this approach. Also, I was constantly updating my
patches for gist and gin index based on reviews.

Here, I am attaching the rebased version of the patch (which is based on an old approch:
acquiring a predicate lock on primary page of a bucket)

Kind Regards,
Shubham

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP Patch: Precalculate stable functions, infrastructure v1
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit