Hi,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 10:52 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's correct with the v2 patch. If we were to fix it for
> > parallel workers started by any bg worker (which I think we should),
> > the fix also needs to be back-patched. If agreed, I will check how far
> > back it needs to be back-patched and prepare patches.
>
> I'd fix it only in v19 for now. While the problem exists in the back
> branches too, it has never been reported in the field. Also the next
> minor release will be the final one for v14, there would be no chance
> to fix it there if this change turned out to be wrong. I think that If
> we get a report in the future, we can backpatch it.
Agreed.
> Fine with me. But probably can we remove leader->databaseId ==
> databaseId check? It seems redundant for parallel workers.
That's correct, but I would like to be more cautious here, so I
retained it. I also added a check that the parallel worker's
advertised role is the bootstrap superuser, again to be more cautious.
Please find the attached v3 patches. I split the TAP test into 0002.
Although I reviewed it closely, I don't have a strong opinion on
taking it (unless anyone thinks otherwise), I'm fine to leave it here
in the thread for the records.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
